가입하기 로그인
번역의 전당
최신 번역 영상
번역해 주세요
번역자 포럼
하이라이트
갤러리
최근 본 동영상
지금 로그인하여 원하는
갤러리에 가입해 보세요!

로그인 가입하기
누날 문의
@2019Noonal
patent pending technology

약관보기
개인정보 처리방침

Hate Speech Doesn't Exist
조회수 369회 · 1년 전
번역자 : 클로이 · 하이라이트 : 둔남이
저장
하이라이트 제작
해외 보수 유튜버 영상
갤러리 참여



표현의자유>>>>>>나만 불편해??

다음 동영상
자동 재생
Hate Speech Doesn't Exist
해외 보수 유튜버 영상
조회수 369회 · 1년 전
Heated debate on gender pronouns and free speech in Toronto
University of Toronto professors Jordan Peterson and A.W. Peet discuss the use of alternate pronouns on campus for those who say words like 'he, she, him or her' don't represent them accurately To read more: http://www.cbc.ca/1.3786144 »»» Subscribe to CBC News to watch more videos: http://bit.ly/1RreYWS Connect with CBC News Online: For breaking news, video, audio and in-depth coverage: http://bit.ly/1Z0m6iX Find CBC News on Facebook: http://bit.ly/1WjG36m Follow CBC News on Twitter: http://bit.ly/1sA5P9H For breaking news on Twitter: http://bit.ly/1WjDyks Follow CBC News on Instagram: http://bit.ly/1Z0iE7O Download the CBC News app for iOS: http://apple.co/25mpsUz Download the CBC News app for Android: http://bit.ly/1XxuozZ »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» For more than 75 years, CBC News has been the source Canadians turn to, to keep them informed about their communities, their country and their world. Through regional and national programming on multiple platforms, including CBC Television, CBC News Network, CBC Radio, CBCNews.ca, mobile and on-demand, CBC News and its internationally recognized team of award-winning journalists deliver the breaking stories, the issues, the analyses and the personalities that matter to Canadians.
The 3 Rules of Hate Speech: Free Speech Rules (Episode 2)
Here are three rules you should know about "Hate Speech" and the First Amendment: 1. The First Amendment protects all ideas, loving, hateful, or in between. In the United States, “hate speech” is just a political label, like “un-American speech” or “rude speech.” Some people use the phrase broadly, some more narrowly - but there’s no legal definition, because there is no “hate speech” exception to the First Amendment.. As the Supreme Court held in 1974, “Under the First Amendment there is no such thing as a false idea. However pernicious an opinion may seem, we depend for its correction not on the conscience of judges and juries but on the competition of other ideas." Or, in 2017: “...the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express ‘the thought that we hate.'" That’s from Matal v. Tam, in which the government denied a trademark to an Asian-American band, because the band’s name was seen by some as a racial slur. The government wasn’t even trying to ban the name; it was just denying trademark registration to people who used the name. But even that, the Court concluded, was unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination, and violated the First Amendment. 2. Some speech is not protected by the First Amendment, regardless of whether it’s bigoted or hateful Threats of violence are constitutionally unprotected. That includes all threats--racist threats, threats to police officers, business owners, the President, anyone. Likewise, intentionally inciting immediate violence is sometimes punishable. Classic example: Giving a speech to a mob outside a building, urging them to burn it down. Personal insults said to someone’s face might also be punishable, as so-called “fighting words.” That’s true regardless of whether the insults stem from personal hostility or group hatred related to race, religion, and the like. Indeed, in 1992, the Supreme Court struck down an ordinance that specially targeted bigoted fighting words. 3. Hate crime laws are constitutional, so long as when they punish violence or vandalism, not speech The classic example is Wisconsin v. Mitchell, the 1993 case in which the Supreme Court unanimously upheld hate crimes laws. Todd Mitchell, a young black man, urged some friends to beat up a white boy because the boy was white. Wisconsin law made the beating into a more serious crime because the boy was targeted based on his race. The Court said this is fine, because “a physical assault is not by any stretch of the imagination expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment.” And while the law increased the punishment because of the defendant’s intent, the law often punishes people more because of why they did what they did. Killing someone for money will get you a harsher punishment than killing them out of momentary anger. Likewise, firing an employee because of his race will get you a civil lawsuit; firing an employee for most other reasons won’t. None of this covers the mere expression of hateful ideas, or the use of words that some see as hateful. Those are generally protected by the First Amendment. But why? The Justices generally agree that racist ideas, for instances, are wrong and dangerous. Why would the Justices say hate speech is constitutionally protected? Because they don’t trust government officials to decide which ideas are wrong and dangerous. They worry that if government officials had the power to ban evil ideas, that power would quickly stretch to punishing a wide range of debate and dissent. And they see the First Amendment as requiring that distrust. In the words of Justice Black, echoed by the Supreme Court in 1972, “The freedoms ...guaranteed by the First Amendment must be accorded to the ideas we hate or sooner or later they will be denied to the ideas we cherish.” Written by Eugene Volokh, a First Amendment law professor at UCLA. Produced and edited by Austin Bragg, who is not. This is the second episode of Free Speech Rules, a video series on free speech and the law. Volokh is the co-founder of the Volokh Conspiracy, which is hosted at Reason.com. This is not legal advice. If this were legal advice, it would be followed by a bill. Please use responsibly. Music: "Lobby Time" by Kevin MacLeod, Incompetech.com Music: "You Make Me Alive" by The Slants Wookie Icon by Jory Raphael, symbolicons.com For full text visit https://reason.com/reasontv/2019/02/19/the-3-rules-of-hate-speech
Does Free Speech Offend You?
Should offensive speech be banned? Where should we, as a society, draw the line where permitted speech is on one side, and forbidden speech is on the other? Should we even have that line? And should free speech be limited by things like trigger warnings and punishments for microaggressions? Greg Lukianoff, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, answers these questions and more. Donate today to PragerU! http://l.prageru.com/2ylo1Yt Joining PragerU is free! Sign up now to get all our videos as soon as they're released. http://prageru.com/signup Download Pragerpedia on your iPhone or Android! Thousands of sources and facts at your fingertips. iPhone: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsnbG Android: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsS5e Join Prager United to get new swag every quarter, exclusive early access to our videos, and an annual TownHall phone call with Dennis Prager! http://l.prageru.com/2c9n6ys Join PragerU's text list to have these videos, free merchandise giveaways and breaking announcements sent directly to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a percentage of every Amazon purchase will be donated to PragerU. Same great products. Same low price. Shopping made meaningful. VISIT PragerU! https://www.prageru.com FOLLOW us! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/ PragerU is on Snapchat! JOIN PragerFORCE! For Students: http://l.prageru.com/29SgPaX JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2c8vsff Script: Freedom of speech. The ability to express yourself. It's a cherished idea -- as well it should be. Most of us who live in liberal Western democracies think of it as a basic human right. People have fought and died for it. But now we may be in danger of losing it. The threat is not coming from without -- from external enemies -- but from within. A generation is being raised not to believe in freedom OF speech, but rather that they should have freedom FROM speech -- from speech they dislike. This is a threat to both pluralism and democracy itself. We see this in Europe where "sensitivity-based" censorship attempts to ban anything deemed hateful or even just hurtful, and to ban criticism of religion, especially Islam. But the United States, despite its strong Constitutional protections in the Bill of Rights is far from immune from the rising trend of suppression of speech, or what is sometimes called political correctness. This is especially true at America's colleges and universities, the place where our future leaders are educated and where you'd expect speech to be the most free. Highly restrictive speech codes are now the norm on campuses, not the exception. According to a study by my organization, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education -- FIRE -- 54% of public universities and 59% of private universities impose politically correct speech codes on their students. And thanks to recent Department of Education guidelines 100% of colleges may adopt speech codes in the coming years. How bad is it? At a public campus in California on Constitution Day in 2013, a student who also happens to be a decorated military veteran was told he could not hand out copies of the Constitution to his fellow students. The objection from the university was not ideological; it was out of control bureaucracy imposing limits on speech. That same day another college student in that same state was told he could not protest NSA surveillance outside of a tiny "free speech zone," an area that comprised only 1.37% of the campus. Months later, college students in Hawaii were told both they could not hand out the constitution to their fellow students and that they could not protest NSA policies outside the school's free speech zone! FIRE took these colleges to court, but the that fact we had to shows you how bad it has become. Recently, students and sympathetic faculty have joined forces to exclude campus speakers whose opinions they dislike. At FIRE we call this "disinvitation season" although the season lasts all year round. Since 2009 there has been a major uptick in the push by students and faculty to get speakers they dislike disinvited. These speakers have included former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice; the Somali-born feminist and critic of Islam, Ayaan Hirsi Ali; and the director of the International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagarde. And that's only the obvious part of the disinvitation problem. Few conservative speakers are invited to speak at colleges lest they have to be "disinivited" later. For the complete script, visit https://www.prageru.com/videos/does-free-speech-offend-you
Free speech under attack
Is free speech under fire on Canadian university campuses? Some say it's being stifled in the name of political correctness. »»» Subscribe to The National to watch more videos here: https://www.youtube.com/user/CBCTheNational?sub_confirmation=1 Voice Your Opinion & Connect With Us Online: The National Updates on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thenational The National Updates on Twitter: https://twitter.com/CBCTheNational The National Updates on Google+: https://plus.google.com/+CBCTheNational »»» »»» »»» »»» »»» The National is CBC Television's flagship news program. Airing seven days a week, the show delivers news, feature documentaries and analysis from some of Canada's leading journalists.
Former ACLU Head Ira Glasser on Why You Can't Ban Hate Speech
This clip is taken from the Joe Rogan Experience #1595 with Ira Glasser. https://open.spotify.com/episode/6l8Ho5vcp2yHonhSjLfzdl?si=7M73ECGsStypg1H-WIiNJw
Americanos: Anna Paulina Luna, Mexico
Veteran and speaker Anna Paulina Luna shares her story growing up as a second-generation Latina to Mexican immigrants. From the suburbs of Santa Ana, California, to early encounters with her family’s drug abuse, Anna shares how her family’s rich Latin heritage and her experience in the military helped her seize the American dream.
Does the First Amendment Protect Hate Speech?
America's Town Hall: Join the American Constitution Society and the Federalist Society for a debate hosted by the National Constitution Center on whether the First Amendment protects hate speech. Speakers include David French of the National Review, and Shannon Gilreath of Wake Forest University School of Law. This event was moderated by Jeffrey Rosen, President and CEO, National Constitution Center. Note: The following video contains profane language in the context of the discussion between event panelists.
The "Anti-Hate" Group That Is a Hate Group
The Southern Poverty Law Center bills itself as a watchdog of hate groups. But is this just a cover for its true aims? Journalist and author Karl Zinsmeister explains. Donate today to PragerU! http://l.prageru.com/2ylo1Yt The Southern Poverty Law Center logo and all other logos used in this editorial are the property of their respective owners; their use is not intended to suggest that the editorial is in any way authorized by, sponsored by, or associated with their respective owners. Have you taken the pledge for school choice? Click here! https://www.schoolchoicenow.com Get PragerU bonus content for free! https://www.prageru.com/bonus-content Download Pragerpedia on your iPhone or Android! Thousands of sources and facts at your fingertips. iPhone: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsnbG Android: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsS5e Join Prager United to get new swag every quarter, exclusive early access to our videos, and an annual TownHall phone call with Dennis Prager! http://l.prageru.com/2c9n6ys Join PragerU's text list to have these videos, free merchandise giveaways and breaking announcements sent directly to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a percentage of every Amazon purchase will be donated to PragerU. Same great products. Same low price. Shopping made meaningful. VISIT PragerU! https://www.prageru.com FOLLOW us! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/ PragerU is on Snapchat! JOIN PragerFORCE! For Students: http://l.prageru.com/29SgPaX JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2c8vsff Script: Shutting down people you don’t agree with is about as un-American as you can get. Rigorous debate, honest discussion, open exchange of ideas—that’s the American way. But free thinking and speech are threatened today by a group with a sweet-sounding name that conceals a nefarious purpose. This group is called the Southern Poverty Law Center, or SPLC. Originally founded as a civil-rights law firm in 1971, the SPLC reinvented itself in the mid-‘80s as a political attack group. Every year now it produces a new list of people and charities it claims are “extremists” and “haters.” Aided by glowing coverage from the establishment media, the SPLC’s hate list has become a weapon for taking individuals and groups they disagree with and tarring them with ugly associations. The SPLC employs a two-pronged strategy: First, find a handful of crazies with barely any followers, no address, and no staff, and blow them up into a dangerous movement— proof that there are neo-Nazis lurking everywhere. On their notorious “Hate Map,” the SPLC lists 917 separate hate groups in the U.S.! No one has even heard of more than a handful of them. The second strategy of the SPLC is to undermine legitimate political voices that they oppose by associating them with extremists like the KKK. Take the charity known as the Alliance Defending Freedom. The SPLC lists them as a “hate group.” Is that fair? Well, the ADF has a network of 3,000 attorneys from all across the U.S. who’ve donated more than a million volunteer hours in defense of religious liberty. They’ve had a role in 49 victories at the U.S. Supreme Court. Putting the Alliance Defending Freedom on a list with 130 Ku Klux Klan chapters is not only wrong, it’s malicious. According to the SPLC, one of the most influential social scientists in the U.S.— Charles Murray—is a, quote, “white nationalist.” Ayaan Hirsi Ali, perhaps the most eloquent spokesperson for the rights of Muslim women, is, to the SPLC, a “toxic... anti-Muslim extremist.” Scores of other individuals and charities active in mainstream conservative or religious causes have likewise been branded by the Southern Poverty Law Center as threats to society. Mind you, it is entirely fair to disagree with any of those folks. But it is utterly unfair to call them haters or extremists. The largest category listed by the SPLC as extremists—with 623 entries—covers groups like the Tea Party organizations that are wary of centralized government. Last time we checked, favoring smaller government was a mainstream and perfectly honorable American tradition. What is not honorable is the course prescribed by a leader of the SPLC, Mark Potok, who was caught on video proclaiming the organization’s true intentions. He told a group of supporters, quote, “the press will describe us as ‘monitoring hate groups’…. I want to say plainly that our aim in life is to destroy these groups, to completely destroy them.” Portraying someone with political views different from your own as a public menace is bullying. And it’s a dangerous game. Instead of reducing hate and violence, the SPLC’s name-calling directly incites it. For the complete script, visit https://www.prageru.com/videos/anti-hate-group-hate-group
Why Freedom of Speech Is Necessary | Jordan B Peterson
Freedom of speech is important in order to keep your mind organized. Without free speech there is no true thought. "The reason you think is so that your thoughts can die instead of you". The full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieSEzGyULLc&feature=youtu.be Want to support this channel? Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanbpeterson Relevant Links: JB Peterson Online Psychological Programs: NEW: BFAS Personality Assessment: http://www.understandmyself.com Self Authoring: http://selfauthoring.com/ Books: 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: https://jordanbpeterson.com/12-rules-... Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief: https://jordanbpeterson.com/maps-of-m... Jordan Peterson Website: http://jordanbpeterson.com/ Podcast: http://jordanbpeterson.com/jordan-b-p... Reading List: http://jordanbpeterson.com/2017/03/gr... Twitter: https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson
Dazzle your friends with your knowledge of 1st amendment free speech
http://vondranlegal.com/free-speech-lawyer/. [over 600 videos and growing]. Subscribe for new videos: https://bit.ly/38vXDzk Most people think "I can say whatever I want its a free country" or "with free speech I can say whatever is on my mind." While this may be physically true, legally free speech can be costly. Most people I have met in my life really don't know much about the first amendment free speech. As Attorney Steve points out in the video "Free speech is not absolute." Speech can be regulated, prohibited, or outlawed in certain instances making your speech potentially illegal resulting in civil fines, penalties, damages, lawsuits, or worse yet, criminal violations such as a misdemeanor or potentially a felony. Some areas that are "not absolute" are: 1. Hate speech 2. Fighting words 3. Clear and present danger / inciting riots (I think we are learning something about this these days) 4. Defamation (libel / slander) 5. Disclosure of trade secrets or breaching non-disclosure agreements 6. Obscenity 7. Certain commercial speech (ex. false advertising) Watch this video so you can be ONE UP on your friends who do not truly understand the 1st amendment, or how it requires a "state actor" in most cases, or how the 1st amendment is incorporated into the 14th amendment and made applicable to the states or fail to understand the "strict scrutiny" test for laws that infringe on, or impinge free speech rights keeping in mind that reasonable "time, place and manner" regulations on free speech (not directed toward the content of the message) will normally be upheld as constitutional. Feel free to share this video on your social media networks! Hope you enjoy! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ⭕ SUBSCRIBE to EDUCATE YOURSELF on ALL THINGS LAW ⭕ https://www.youtube.com/user/Attorney... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 🔥 Check out my video on WINNING SMALL CLAIMS LAWSUITS here 🔥 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTUhB... 👨‍🎓 Learn how to register a trademark WITHOUT A LAWYER here 👨‍🎓 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gSE5... ✔️ Get some tips on MEDIATION SUCCESS here ✔️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E32Ks... ✈️ Watch my video on ULTIMATE DEPOSITION TIPS here ✈️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyT0C... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 💡 Join us on Social Media 💡 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevevond... Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/attorneysteve/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/attorneystev... Twitter: https://twitter.com/SteveVondran -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 🖥️ Contact us for a consultation 🖥️ https://www.vondranlegal.com/contact-us ☎️ Or call us at ☎️ (877) 276-5084 (time permitting - we cannot respond to ALL calls) ☁️ For advertising, promotional, and endorsement opportunities, visit us at ☁️ https://www.vondranlegal.com/attorney.... (We can help promote your law or legal related or other products) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 👉🏻 More Important Info! 👈🏻 🎥 Attorney Steve's Setup 🎥 https://www.vondranlegal.com/my-setup 🕺🏻 Merchandise 🕺🏻 https://www.vondranlegal.com/merchandise 🌟 Avvo Client Reviews 🌟 https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/94104-... 🙌🏻 Support us on Patreon 🙌🏻 https://www.patreon.com/AttorneySteve... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 🏢 Main Office 🏢 San Francisco Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/san-fran... Other Locations: Phoenix - Camelback Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/phoenix-... Phoenix - Uptown Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/phoenix-... San Diego Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/san-dieg... Orange County Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/orange-c... Santa Monica Office: https://www.vondranlegal.com/beverly-... Copyright Policy Institute Office: Washington D.C. https://www.copyrightpolicy.org/ NOTICE: This website is general legal information only and not legal advice. Please do not rely. Some information may not be accurate. We are licensed in CA and AZ. Check your local rules. Parts of our videos may constitute “fair use” under the copyright laws, if you have an issue, please call us at (877) 276-5084. We are not liable for your use or viewing of our videos. Thanks for watching! © 2020 Attorney Steve Vondran. All rights reserved.
What Is Hate Speech? We Asked College Students
How should "hate speech" be defined, and should it be regulated? We went to the campus of USC to ask college students, who are on the front lines of America's free speech battles. Subscribe to our YouTube channel: http://youtube.com/reasontv Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason.Magazine/ Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/reason Subscribe to our podcast at iTunes: https://goo.gl/az3a7a Reason is the planet's leading source of news, politics, and culture from a libertarian perspective. Go to reason.com for a point of view you won't get from legacy media and old left-right opinion magazines. ----------------
How Do Lockdowns Impact Mental Health?
Coronavirus lockdowns have created a mental health crisis. Substance abuse, overdoses, domestic violence, and child abuse are all on the rise. The Department of Health & Human Services estimates "deaths of despair" could reach as high as 150,000. Are the lockdowns doing more harm than good? What are some ways to cope with all of the uncertainty and confusion? Will Witt discusses with psychiatrist Dr. Stephen Marmer.
Campus Free Speech Realities And Myths | Lee Rowland | TEDxUniversityofNevada
University of Nevada, Reno (UNR) students and graduates have been embroiled in two of the biggest free speech controversies in recent years. In 2016, UNR graduate and National Football League (NFL) player Colin Kaepernick protested before football games when he refused to stand for the national anthem. In the summer of 2017, UNR student Peter Cvjetanovic became the face of the white nationalist rally he attended in Charlottesville, Virginia. Reflecting on these examples, Lee Rowland discusses three myths about our First Amendment rights and then concludes with practical suggestions for exercising free speech rights powerfully and strategically. Lee Rowland is a senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. Lee has extensive experience as a litigator, lobbyist, and public speaker. She has served as lead counsel in federal First Amendment cases involving public employee speech rights, the First Amendment rights of community advocates, government regulation of digital speech, and state secrecy surrounding the lethal injection process. She also authors amicus briefs and blogs on topics including the intersection of speech and privacy, student and public employee speech, obscenity, and the Communications Decency Act. While at the ACLU, Lee has served as an adjunct clinical professor for NYU Law’s Technology Law and Policy Clinic, a member of the New York Bar Association’s Communications and Media Law Committee, and an adjunct faculty member in the Human Rights Program at the Roosevelt House Public Policy Institute at Hunter College. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at https://www.ted.com/tedx
Should social media be regulated? I Inside Story
It's a long-running debate: how should we regulate the internet and social media? While sites including facebook and twitter allow us to share information, they've also become places for illegal and harmful content to thrive. The UK now wants those firms to be more responsible. The government will appoint its Broadcast regulator Ofcom as an online watchdog, with powers to force companies to take down certain material. Other countries such as Germany and Australia have brought in measures to control online content. But is regulation the answer? And can it be done without violating personal freedoms? Presenter: Nastasya Tay Guests: David Erdos - Deputy Director, Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL) at the University of Cambridge. Eliska Pirkova - Europe Policy Analyst for Access Now, a digital rights advocacy group. Meera Selva - Director, Journalism Fellowship Programme, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford. Subscribe to our channel http://bit.ly/AJSubscribe Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/AJEnglish Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/aljazeera Check our website: http://www.aljazeera.com/ #Aljazeeraenglish #News #InsideStory #SocialMedia
The War on Free Speech Explained - Jordan Peterson
Original upload: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpA5iDpnrbw Please, like, share, subscribe, and comment! Also, please, turn on your notification button/bell next to the subscribe button for the latest interviews and Jordan Peterson clips, videos, lectures and speeches. Jordan Peterson grants me Partial License.https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNdW82WWvjQEF5tUWVXvdKg/community @TeamYouTube The intro piano composition is Gymnopedie No. 2 by Erik Satie, performed by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/b... Jordan B. Peterson's New Book: 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: http://amzn.to/2H4kUYW Jordan Peterson's Links: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanbpeterson Self Authoring: http://selfauthoring.com/ Jordan Peterson Website: http://jordanbpeterson.com/ Podcast: https://jordanbpeterson.com/jordan-b-peterson-podcast/ Reading List (2017): https://jordanbpeterson.com/2017/10/great-books/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson United States Affiliate Link: http://amzn.to/2BFsNEr UK Affiliate Link: http://amzn.to/2Ix8ZUS Canada Affiliate Link: http://amzn.to/2GH5jPU All amazon links on this page are affiliate links and Benefit the Dose of Truth Channel, thank you for supporting!