가입하기 로그인
번역의 전당
최신 번역 영상
번역해 주세요
번역자 포럼
하이라이트
갤러리
최근 본 동영상
지금 로그인하여 원하는
갤러리에 가입해 보세요!

로그인 가입하기
누날 문의
@2019Noonal
patent pending technology

약관보기
개인정보 처리방침

Hate Speech Doesn't Exist
조회수 370회 · 1년 전
번역자 : 클로이
저장
하이라이트 제작
해외 보수 유튜버 영상
갤러리 참여



표현의자유>>>>>>나만 불편해??

다음 동영상
자동 재생
Hate Speech Doesn't Exist
해외 보수 유튜버 영상
조회수 370회 · 1년 전
Heated debate on gender pronouns and free speech in Toronto
University of Toronto professors Jordan Peterson and A.W. Peet discuss the use of alternate pronouns on campus for those who say words like 'he, she, him or her' don't represent them accurately To read more: http://www.cbc.ca/1.3786144 »»» Subscribe to CBC News to watch more videos: http://bit.ly/1RreYWS Connect with CBC News Online: For breaking news, video, audio and in-depth coverage: http://bit.ly/1Z0m6iX Find CBC News on Facebook: http://bit.ly/1WjG36m Follow CBC News on Twitter: http://bit.ly/1sA5P9H For breaking news on Twitter: http://bit.ly/1WjDyks Follow CBC News on Instagram: http://bit.ly/1Z0iE7O Download the CBC News app for iOS: http://apple.co/25mpsUz Download the CBC News app for Android: http://bit.ly/1XxuozZ »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» For more than 75 years, CBC News has been the source Canadians turn to, to keep them informed about their communities, their country and their world. Through regional and national programming on multiple platforms, including CBC Television, CBC News Network, CBC Radio, CBCNews.ca, mobile and on-demand, CBC News and its internationally recognized team of award-winning journalists deliver the breaking stories, the issues, the analyses and the personalities that matter to Canadians.
Does Free Speech Offend You?
Should offensive speech be banned? Where should we, as a society, draw the line where permitted speech is on one side, and forbidden speech is on the other? Should we even have that line? And should free speech be limited by things like trigger warnings and punishments for microaggressions? Greg Lukianoff, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, answers these questions and more. Donate today to PragerU! http://l.prageru.com/2ylo1Yt Joining PragerU is free! Sign up now to get all our videos as soon as they're released. http://prageru.com/signup Download Pragerpedia on your iPhone or Android! Thousands of sources and facts at your fingertips. iPhone: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsnbG Android: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsS5e Join Prager United to get new swag every quarter, exclusive early access to our videos, and an annual TownHall phone call with Dennis Prager! http://l.prageru.com/2c9n6ys Join PragerU's text list to have these videos, free merchandise giveaways and breaking announcements sent directly to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a percentage of every Amazon purchase will be donated to PragerU. Same great products. Same low price. Shopping made meaningful. VISIT PragerU! https://www.prageru.com FOLLOW us! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/ PragerU is on Snapchat! JOIN PragerFORCE! For Students: http://l.prageru.com/29SgPaX JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2c8vsff Script: Freedom of speech. The ability to express yourself. It's a cherished idea -- as well it should be. Most of us who live in liberal Western democracies think of it as a basic human right. People have fought and died for it. But now we may be in danger of losing it. The threat is not coming from without -- from external enemies -- but from within. A generation is being raised not to believe in freedom OF speech, but rather that they should have freedom FROM speech -- from speech they dislike. This is a threat to both pluralism and democracy itself. We see this in Europe where "sensitivity-based" censorship attempts to ban anything deemed hateful or even just hurtful, and to ban criticism of religion, especially Islam. But the United States, despite its strong Constitutional protections in the Bill of Rights is far from immune from the rising trend of suppression of speech, or what is sometimes called political correctness. This is especially true at America's colleges and universities, the place where our future leaders are educated and where you'd expect speech to be the most free. Highly restrictive speech codes are now the norm on campuses, not the exception. According to a study by my organization, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education -- FIRE -- 54% of public universities and 59% of private universities impose politically correct speech codes on their students. And thanks to recent Department of Education guidelines 100% of colleges may adopt speech codes in the coming years. How bad is it? At a public campus in California on Constitution Day in 2013, a student who also happens to be a decorated military veteran was told he could not hand out copies of the Constitution to his fellow students. The objection from the university was not ideological; it was out of control bureaucracy imposing limits on speech. That same day another college student in that same state was told he could not protest NSA surveillance outside of a tiny "free speech zone," an area that comprised only 1.37% of the campus. Months later, college students in Hawaii were told both they could not hand out the constitution to their fellow students and that they could not protest NSA policies outside the school's free speech zone! FIRE took these colleges to court, but the that fact we had to shows you how bad it has become. Recently, students and sympathetic faculty have joined forces to exclude campus speakers whose opinions they dislike. At FIRE we call this "disinvitation season" although the season lasts all year round. Since 2009 there has been a major uptick in the push by students and faculty to get speakers they dislike disinvited. These speakers have included former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice; the Somali-born feminist and critic of Islam, Ayaan Hirsi Ali; and the director of the International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagarde. And that's only the obvious part of the disinvitation problem. Few conservative speakers are invited to speak at colleges lest they have to be "disinivited" later. For the complete script, visit https://www.prageru.com/videos/does-free-speech-offend-you
Americanos: Anna Paulina Luna, Mexico
Veteran and speaker Anna Paulina Luna shares her story growing up as a second-generation Latina to Mexican immigrants. From the suburbs of Santa Ana, California, to early encounters with her family’s drug abuse, Anna shares how her family’s rich Latin heritage and her experience in the military helped her seize the American dream.
The "Anti-Hate" Group That Is a Hate Group
The Southern Poverty Law Center bills itself as a watchdog of hate groups. But is this just a cover for its true aims? Journalist and author Karl Zinsmeister explains. Donate today to PragerU! http://l.prageru.com/2ylo1Yt The Southern Poverty Law Center logo and all other logos used in this editorial are the property of their respective owners; their use is not intended to suggest that the editorial is in any way authorized by, sponsored by, or associated with their respective owners. Have you taken the pledge for school choice? Click here! https://www.schoolchoicenow.com Get PragerU bonus content for free! https://www.prageru.com/bonus-content Download Pragerpedia on your iPhone or Android! Thousands of sources and facts at your fingertips. iPhone: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsnbG Android: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsS5e Join Prager United to get new swag every quarter, exclusive early access to our videos, and an annual TownHall phone call with Dennis Prager! http://l.prageru.com/2c9n6ys Join PragerU's text list to have these videos, free merchandise giveaways and breaking announcements sent directly to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a percentage of every Amazon purchase will be donated to PragerU. Same great products. Same low price. Shopping made meaningful. VISIT PragerU! https://www.prageru.com FOLLOW us! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/ PragerU is on Snapchat! JOIN PragerFORCE! For Students: http://l.prageru.com/29SgPaX JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2c8vsff Script: Shutting down people you don’t agree with is about as un-American as you can get. Rigorous debate, honest discussion, open exchange of ideas—that’s the American way. But free thinking and speech are threatened today by a group with a sweet-sounding name that conceals a nefarious purpose. This group is called the Southern Poverty Law Center, or SPLC. Originally founded as a civil-rights law firm in 1971, the SPLC reinvented itself in the mid-‘80s as a political attack group. Every year now it produces a new list of people and charities it claims are “extremists” and “haters.” Aided by glowing coverage from the establishment media, the SPLC’s hate list has become a weapon for taking individuals and groups they disagree with and tarring them with ugly associations. The SPLC employs a two-pronged strategy: First, find a handful of crazies with barely any followers, no address, and no staff, and blow them up into a dangerous movement— proof that there are neo-Nazis lurking everywhere. On their notorious “Hate Map,” the SPLC lists 917 separate hate groups in the U.S.! No one has even heard of more than a handful of them. The second strategy of the SPLC is to undermine legitimate political voices that they oppose by associating them with extremists like the KKK. Take the charity known as the Alliance Defending Freedom. The SPLC lists them as a “hate group.” Is that fair? Well, the ADF has a network of 3,000 attorneys from all across the U.S. who’ve donated more than a million volunteer hours in defense of religious liberty. They’ve had a role in 49 victories at the U.S. Supreme Court. Putting the Alliance Defending Freedom on a list with 130 Ku Klux Klan chapters is not only wrong, it’s malicious. According to the SPLC, one of the most influential social scientists in the U.S.— Charles Murray—is a, quote, “white nationalist.” Ayaan Hirsi Ali, perhaps the most eloquent spokesperson for the rights of Muslim women, is, to the SPLC, a “toxic... anti-Muslim extremist.” Scores of other individuals and charities active in mainstream conservative or religious causes have likewise been branded by the Southern Poverty Law Center as threats to society. Mind you, it is entirely fair to disagree with any of those folks. But it is utterly unfair to call them haters or extremists. The largest category listed by the SPLC as extremists—with 623 entries—covers groups like the Tea Party organizations that are wary of centralized government. Last time we checked, favoring smaller government was a mainstream and perfectly honorable American tradition. What is not honorable is the course prescribed by a leader of the SPLC, Mark Potok, who was caught on video proclaiming the organization’s true intentions. He told a group of supporters, quote, “the press will describe us as ‘monitoring hate groups’…. I want to say plainly that our aim in life is to destroy these groups, to completely destroy them.” Portraying someone with political views different from your own as a public menace is bullying. And it’s a dangerous game. Instead of reducing hate and violence, the SPLC’s name-calling directly incites it. For the complete script, visit https://www.prageru.com/videos/anti-hate-group-hate-group
Fireside Chat Ep. 105 — The Gender Identity Experiment
During this week’s Fireside Chat, Dennis talks about Air Canada removing any mention of “Ladies and Gentlemen” from their flights. Many companies feel a societal pressure to follow new gender rules in order to “act moral." However, caving to the pressure of the LGBTQ lobby is damaging to society. • Ladies And Gentlemen Is Offensive • A Radical Gender Experiment • Democrats Are Extreme In Everything | 5-Minute Video: Left Or Liberal? https://www.prageru.com/video/left-or-liberal/ • Watch Dennis Prager and Adam Carolla’s New Movie, "No Safe Spaces": https://nosafespaces.com 0:00 Welcome, Otto Is Out 0:41 Dennis Loves Learning About Others 3:19 “Ladies And Gentlemen” Is Offensive 4:32 Who Has No Gender Identity? 5:30 A Company’s Pressure To Act Moral 6:45 A Radical Gender Experiment 7:51 Camille Paglia On The Radio 9:06 Most Trans Make Peace With Their Sex 9:50 Hillary And Chelsea Clinton 10:50 People Need A Cause To Live For 13:15 Democrats Are Extreme In Everything 15:45 The Importance Of Knowing History 17:10 The Importance Of Friendships 20:54 Grandparents Can’t Talk About God 26:20 What Do Women Need To Feel Loved? 31:53 Check Out No Safe Spaces
The 3 Rules of Hate Speech: Free Speech Rules (Episode 2)
Here are three rules you should know about "Hate Speech" and the First Amendment: 1. The First Amendment protects all ideas, loving, hateful, or in between. In the United States, “hate speech” is just a political label, like “un-American speech” or “rude speech.” Some people use the phrase broadly, some more narrowly - but there’s no legal definition, because there is no “hate speech” exception to the First Amendment.. As the Supreme Court held in 1974, “Under the First Amendment there is no such thing as a false idea. However pernicious an opinion may seem, we depend for its correction not on the conscience of judges and juries but on the competition of other ideas." Or, in 2017: “...the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express ‘the thought that we hate.'" That’s from Matal v. Tam, in which the government denied a trademark to an Asian-American band, because the band’s name was seen by some as a racial slur. The government wasn’t even trying to ban the name; it was just denying trademark registration to people who used the name. But even that, the Court concluded, was unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination, and violated the First Amendment. 2. Some speech is not protected by the First Amendment, regardless of whether it’s bigoted or hateful Threats of violence are constitutionally unprotected. That includes all threats--racist threats, threats to police officers, business owners, the President, anyone. Likewise, intentionally inciting immediate violence is sometimes punishable. Classic example: Giving a speech to a mob outside a building, urging them to burn it down. Personal insults said to someone’s face might also be punishable, as so-called “fighting words.” That’s true regardless of whether the insults stem from personal hostility or group hatred related to race, religion, and the like. Indeed, in 1992, the Supreme Court struck down an ordinance that specially targeted bigoted fighting words. 3. Hate crime laws are constitutional, so long as when they punish violence or vandalism, not speech The classic example is Wisconsin v. Mitchell, the 1993 case in which the Supreme Court unanimously upheld hate crimes laws. Todd Mitchell, a young black man, urged some friends to beat up a white boy because the boy was white. Wisconsin law made the beating into a more serious crime because the boy was targeted based on his race. The Court said this is fine, because “a physical assault is not by any stretch of the imagination expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment.” And while the law increased the punishment because of the defendant’s intent, the law often punishes people more because of why they did what they did. Killing someone for money will get you a harsher punishment than killing them out of momentary anger. Likewise, firing an employee because of his race will get you a civil lawsuit; firing an employee for most other reasons won’t. None of this covers the mere expression of hateful ideas, or the use of words that some see as hateful. Those are generally protected by the First Amendment. But why? The Justices generally agree that racist ideas, for instances, are wrong and dangerous. Why would the Justices say hate speech is constitutionally protected? Because they don’t trust government officials to decide which ideas are wrong and dangerous. They worry that if government officials had the power to ban evil ideas, that power would quickly stretch to punishing a wide range of debate and dissent. And they see the First Amendment as requiring that distrust. In the words of Justice Black, echoed by the Supreme Court in 1972, “The freedoms ...guaranteed by the First Amendment must be accorded to the ideas we hate or sooner or later they will be denied to the ideas we cherish.” Written by Eugene Volokh, a First Amendment law professor at UCLA. Produced and edited by Austin Bragg, who is not. This is the second episode of Free Speech Rules, a video series on free speech and the law. Volokh is the co-founder of the Volokh Conspiracy, which is hosted at Reason.com. This is not legal advice. If this were legal advice, it would be followed by a bill. Please use responsibly. Music: "Lobby Time" by Kevin MacLeod, Incompetech.com Music: "You Make Me Alive" by The Slants Wookie Icon by Jory Raphael, symbolicons.com For full text visit https://reason.com/reasontv/2019/02/19/the-3-rules-of-hate-speech
The Mainstream Media Will Not Tell the Truth About Black Lives Matter
What the media won't acknowledge: Black Lives Matter fuels violent anti-police sentiment. WATCH 🔥 Sheriff David Clarke with the facts (and Don Lemon with the stammering and cut to commercial). 🔥
You Can't Be Free Without This
It wasn’t an accident that the First Amendment to the Constitution is about religious liberty. Why was it so important to the Founders? And why should it be just as important to you? Kelly Shackelford, President of First Liberty, explains. FOLLOW us! Facebook: 👉https://www.facebook.com/prageru Twitter: 👉https://twitter.com/prageru Instagram: 👉https://instagram.com/prageru/ SUBSCRIBE so you never miss a new video! 👉 https://www.prageru.com/join/ To view the script, sources, quiz, visit https://www.prageru.com/video/you-cant-be-free-without-this Join PragerU's text list to have these videos, free merchandise giveaways and breaking announcements sent directly to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a percentage of every Amazon purchase will be donated to PragerU. Same great products. Same low price. Shopping made meaningful. SHOP! Love PragerU? Now you can wear PragerU merchandise! Visit our store today! https://shop.prageru.com/ Script: What is religious freedom? Why is it important? And why is it now under threat? "Hold on a second," I can hear you saying. "Religious freedom is threatened? Who doesn't have religious freedom in the United States? You can be a Protestant, a Catholic, a Jew, a Muslim, or a Wiccan. You can believe in anything—or nothing." This was true. But not anymore. Seems like almost every week a new dispute arises between people of faith and government agencies alleging that believers are violating the rights of non-believers, or simply violating government edicts. Given that the search for religious freedom was central to the founding of America, this is quite a reversal. As Thomas Paine put it in his influential 1776 pamphlet, Common Sense, "This new world hath been the asylum for the persecuted lovers of civil and religious liberty from every part of Europe." It wasn't an accident that the first freedom listed in the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution, is about religious liberty. Here's what it says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…" This meant the new United States would have no government-sponsored religion, as Europe had at the time, and no restrictions on how you practiced your religion.  British historian Paul Johnson draws a stark and telling contrast between the two great revolutions of the 18th century.  "The essential difference between the American Revolution and the French Revolution is that the American Revolution, in its origins, was a religious event, whereas the French Revolution was an anti-religious event. That fact was to shape the American Revolution...and determine the nature of the independent state it brought into being." Now, two centuries after the Bill of Rights, freedom of religion, one of the main goals of the American Revolution, has morphed into freedom from religion—one of the main goals of the French Revolution. That's not what any American should wish for. Here's why: because when they come for your religious freedom, they're coming for all your freedom. It's the totalitarian "tell." The giveaway. This is what the Founders understood and why they were so insistent that religious liberty be in the Constitution. To them, freedom of liberty was tantamount to freedom of thought. If you aren't free to think as you wish, you can't claim to be free. They were right. There is no example in history of a regime suppressing religious freedom and not suppressing other freedoms. One of the first things the communists did in Russia after the Russian Revolution in 1917 was to close nearly every church and take control of all religious life in the Soviet Union—Christian, Jewish, and Muslim. To this day, all religious life in China is strictly controlled by the Chinese communist government. Why do repressive governments fear religious freedom? Because it challenges the authority of the state more than any other freedom. People who adhere to a religion believe that there’s something higher than the state, and no repressive government can tolerate such a belief. That makes religion the first target of those who want ever more power—and ever more control over its citizens. That's why, even if you're not religious, if you care about freedom, you should care deeply about religious liberty. My job is to protect religious liberty. And, let me tell you, the trends are troubling. Eight years ago, my case load was 47; last year it was over 300. For the complete script visit https://www.prageru.com/video/you-cant-be-free-without-this
What You Need to Know Before Buying Firearms
The coronavirus pandemic has exposed the fragility of life as we know it. Social norms have changed, people are hoarding supplies, and gun sales have spiked. Will Witt sits with the security professionals at Covered Six to get expert advice on firearms, personal safety, home security, and how to be as prepared as possible in these uncertain times.
Student Calls Cops on PragerU
😭THIS IS AMAZING A student calls campus security on Will Witt for "terrorizing" students by asking them questions. The audacity! 🤣 The left does NOT want you to think for yourself! Will's PragerU logo shirt is available now in the PragerU Store: https://l.prageru.com/3bcfkma Use code WILL10 for 10% off your next order!
Hate Speech Isn't Real | Change My Mind
In this part two of our "Change My Mind" series, Steven Crowder takes to the streets to discuss hate speech, the First Amendment and more with strangers who hold strong opposing views. Civil discussion ensues and some minds are changed! MUSIC BY POGO https://www.youtube.com/pogo Want to watch the full show every day? Join #MugClub! http://louderwithcrowder.com/mugclub Use promo codes "student" "veteran" "military" to get daily access for $69/year! Shop the official #LWC store: http://louderwithcrowdershop.com More at http://louderwithcrowder.com Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/scrowder Like me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/stevencrowde... Check out more of my videos! UNDERCOVER IN ANTIFA: Their Tactics and Media Support Exposed! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmNz2jGzsDA REAL CONVERSATIONS: I'm Pro-Gun | Change My Mind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APC2jnOSfhQ Social Justice Warriors Get Owned In Epic Rant By Comedian (Crowder) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oss7KmiHLmA HIDDEN CAM: "Gun Show Loophole" Exposed! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEihkjKNhN8 Crowder Crashes a Feminist Film Festival in Underwear! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWJT0egzAy0 FAIL: Eminem Rips Donald Trump on BET (PARODY) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrdT1rEO54c&t=34s Pop culture and politics from the most politically incorrect comedy channel on the web. Hippies and Muslims hate me!
Ben Shapiro NAILS Hate Speech and Censorship in 2 Minutes
On October 3 2017, I "crashed" a hearing set by the California State Senate Judiciary Committee to address “Combatting Hate While Protecting the Constitution” in Sacramento. The point of the hearing was to determine the point where free speech meets hate speech, and where hate speech should start being censored. As you can imagine, I had some pretty strong feelings about this. The hearing featured testimony by many left-wing public figures but failed to incorporate any feedback from conservatives, despite the fact that right-wing and center-right speakers like myself have encountered hateful backlash on college campuses in recent months. I was given two minutes to speak under the "public comments" section - here's what he had to say.
Why Freedom of Speech Is Necessary | Jordan B Peterson
Freedom of speech is important in order to keep your mind organized. Without free speech there is no true thought. "The reason you think is so that your thoughts can die instead of you". The full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieSEzGyULLc&feature=youtu.be Want to support this channel? Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanbpeterson Relevant Links: JB Peterson Online Psychological Programs: NEW: BFAS Personality Assessment: http://www.understandmyself.com Self Authoring: http://selfauthoring.com/ Books: 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: https://jordanbpeterson.com/12-rules-... Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief: https://jordanbpeterson.com/maps-of-m... Jordan Peterson Website: http://jordanbpeterson.com/ Podcast: http://jordanbpeterson.com/jordan-b-p... Reading List: http://jordanbpeterson.com/2017/03/gr... Twitter: https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson
Former ACLU Head Ira Glasser on Why You Can't Ban Hate Speech
This clip is taken from the Joe Rogan Experience #1595 with Ira Glasser. https://open.spotify.com/episode/6l8Ho5vcp2yHonhSjLfzdl?si=7M73ECGsStypg1H-WIiNJw
Who Is Teaching Your Kids?
Dangerous people are filling the heads of young people with dangerous nonsense. Who are these people? They are what Jordan Peterson calls “the post-modernists:” neo-Marxist professors who dominate our colleges and universities. And here’s the worst part: we are financing these nihilists with tax dollars, alumni gifts and tuition payments. Time to wise up. After watching this video, please take our quick survey: https://l.prageru.com/2M7DstJ Donate today to PragerU! http://l.prageru.com/2eB2p0h Get PragerU bonus content for free! https://www.prageru.com/bonus-content Download Pragerpedia on your iPhone or Android! Thousands of sources and facts at your fingertips. iPhone: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsnbG Android: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsS5e Join Prager United to get new swag every quarter, exclusive early access to our videos, and an annual TownHall phone call with Dennis Prager! http://l.prageru.com/2c9n6ys Join PragerU's text list to have these videos, free merchandise giveaways and breaking announcements sent directly to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a percentage of every Amazon purchase will be donated to PragerU. Same great products. Same low price. Shopping made meaningful. VISIT PragerU! https://www.prageru.com FOLLOW us! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/ PragerU is on Snapchat! JOIN PragerFORCE! For Students: http://l.prageru.com/2aozfkP JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2aoz2y9 Script: You may not realize it, but you are currently funding some dangerous people. They are indoctrinating young minds throughout the West with their resentment-ridden ideology. They have made it their life's mission to undermine Western civilization itself, which they regard as corrupt, oppressive and “patriarchal.” If you're a taxpayer—or paying for your kid's liberal arts degree—you're underwriting this gang of nihilists. You're supporting ideologues who claim that all truth is subjective; that all sex differences are socially constructed; and that Western imperialism is the sole source of all Third World problems. They are the post-modernists, pushing “progressive” activism at a college near you. They produce the mobs that violently shut down campus speakers; the language police who enshrine into law use of fabricated gender pronouns; and the deans whose livelihoods depend on madly rooting out discrimination where little or none exists. Their thinking took hold in Western universities in the ‘60s and ‘70s, when the true believers of the radical left became the professors of today. And now we rack up education-related debt—not so that our children learn to think critically, write clearly, or speak properly, but so they can model their mentors' destructive agenda. It's now possible to complete an English degree and never encounter Shakespeare—one of those dead white males whose works underlie our “society of oppression.” To understand and oppose the post-modernists, the ideas by which they orient themselves must be clearly identified. First is their new unholy trinity of diversity, equity and inclusion. Diversity is defined not by opinion, but by race, ethnicity or sexual identity; equity is no longer the laudable goal of equality of opportunity, but the insistence on equality of outcome; and inclusion is the use of identity-based quotas to attain this misconceived state of equity. All the classic rights of the West are to be considered secondary to these new values. Take, for example, freedom of speech—the very pillar of democracy. The post-modernists refuse to believe that people of good will can exchange ideas and reach consensus. Their world is instead a Hobbesian nightmare of identity groups warring for power. They don't see ideas that run contrary to their ideology as simply incorrect. They see them as integral to the oppressive system they wish to supplant, and consider it a moral obligation to stifle and constrain their expression. For the complete script, visit https://www.prageru.com/videos/who-is-teaching-your-kids